A defence review must tackle the hard questions of the type posed by Secretary Rumsfeld. However, such a review must not be just an exercise in re-apportioning the budget and ensuring a fair share for each service. 2 Canada however, has not issued a detailed analysis of its defence requirements since 1994, and the need to conduct some form of comprehensive review seems to be the one thing on which virtually all defence critics, analysts and practitioners in Canada agree. The United Kingdom’s Ministry of Defence has, for example, completed five defence reviews or updates in the past six years, the most recent in July of this year. Does DoD need to think through new ways to organize, train, equip and focus to deal with the global war on terror? Are the changes we have and are making too modest and incremental? My impression is that we have not yet made truly bold moves, although we have made many sensible, logical moves in the right direction, but are they enough?Īre military forces being transformed from Cold War models into relevant, efficient and effective forces that are able to deal with current and future security environments? Secretary Rumsfeld’s questions could have been asked by almost every Minister responsible for defence in any Western nation, and most defence ministries are reviewing roles and force structures. Is DoD changing fast enough to deal with the new 21st century security environment?. For more information on accessing this file, please visit our help page.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |